Template talk:Characters: Difference between revisions
From Elwiki
IceSoulMOG (talk | contribs) |
(→Streamlining: new section) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
[[File:ElswordAFNEW.png]] [[File:AishaAFNEW.png]] [[File:RenaAFNEW.png]] [[File:RavenAFNEW.png]] [[File:EveAFNEW.png]] [[File:ChungAFNEW.png]] [[File:AraAFNEW.png]] [[File:ElesisAFNEW.png]] [[File:AddAFNEW.png]] [[File:LuAFNEW.png]] [[File:CielAFNEW.png]] | [[File:ElswordAFNEW.png]] [[File:AishaAFNEW.png]] [[File:RenaAFNEW.png]] [[File:RavenAFNEW.png]] [[File:EveAFNEW.png]] [[File:ChungAFNEW.png]] [[File:AraAFNEW.png]] [[File:ElesisAFNEW.png]] [[File:AddAFNEW.png]] [[File:LuAFNEW.png]] [[File:CielAFNEW.png]] | ||
== Streamlining == | |||
If the wiki editor were in HTML (or were simpler) and I had editing privileges I would actually try to do what I want to propose on my own, but its not, and I don't. I'd also like to know the general community consensus on how the new character template looks, just in case I'm in the minority. | |||
I personally preferred the old format with this thing > [[File:Arrowsplit6.png]] | |||
It was smaller and seemed more compact. On the other hand, I can see where someone would be coming from when wanting to have the base job class names shown too. All in all, I think it could work better with something like this: | |||
{{Section | |||
| SectionSty=border: none; | |||
| hStyles=display: none; | |||
| Width=25%; | |||
| Style=padding: 0; | |||
| Title0=<nowiki/> | |||
| Title1=<nowiki/> | |||
| Title2=<nowiki/> | |||
| Title3=<nowiki/> | |||
| Content0= | |||
{{Section | |||
| SectionCls=mw-collapsible mw-collapsed | |||
| SectionSty=border-width: 2px; border-color: #ffffff; | |||
| hStyle=text-align: left; font-size: 0.75em; border: none; | |||
| Styles=text-align: center; font-size: 0.70em; | |||
| Style=padding: 0; | |||
| Color0={{ColorSel|Character|Eve}} | |||
| Title0={{Gap}}[[Image:EveNEW.png|link=Eve]] [[Eve (Another Code)]] | |||
| Content0= | |||
[[Image:Arrowsplit6.png]] | |||
{{{!}} width="100%" | |||
{{!}} style="vertical-align: top" width="33.33%" {{!}} [[Image:CENEW.png|link=Code: Exotic]]<br>[[Code: Exotic]]<br><br>[[File:Arrowdown2.png]]<br>[[Image:CNNEW.png|link=Code: Nemesis]]<br>[[Code: Nemesis]]<br><br>[[File:trantestC.png]]<br>[[Image:CNTransNEW.png|link=Code: Nemesis/Transcendence]]<br>[[Code: Nemesis/Transcendence|Code: Nemesis<br>(Transcendence)]]<br><br> | |||
{{!}} style="vertical-align: top" width="33.33%" {{!}} [[Image:CANEW.png|link=Code: Architecture]]<br>[[Code: Architecture|Code:<br>Architecture]]<br>[[File:Arrowdown2.png]]<br>[[Image:CMNEW.png|link=Code: Empress]]<br>[[Code: Empress]]<br><br>[[File:trantestC.png]]<br>[[Image:CEmTransNEW.png|link=Code: Empress/Transcendence]]<br>[[Code: Empress/Transcendence|Code: Empress<br>(Transcendence)]]<br><br> | |||
{{!}} style="vertical-align: top" width="33.33%" {{!}} [[Image:CLNEW.png|link=Code: Electra]]<br>[[Code: Electra]]<br><br>[[File:Arrowdown2.png]]<br>[[Image:CBSNEW.png|link=Code: Battle Seraph]]<br>[[Code: Battle Seraph|Code: Battle<br>Seraph]]<br>[[File:trantestC.png]]<br>[[Image:CBSTransNEW.png|link=Code: Battle Seraph/Transcendence]]<br>[[Code: Battle Seraph/Transcendence|Code: Battle<br>Seraph<br>(Transcendence)]] | |||
{{!}}} | |||
}} | |||
| Content1= | |||
{{Section | |||
| SectionSty=border-width: 2px; border-color: #ffffff; | |||
}} | |||
| Content2= | |||
{{Section | |||
| SectionSty=border-width: 2px; border-color: #ffffff; | |||
}} | |||
| Content3= | |||
{{Section | |||
| SectionSty=border-width: 2px; border-color: #ffffff; | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
Compact <i>and</i> informative. Thoughts? |
Revision as of 06:50, 30 January 2017
Position of classes
Frame of the icons
Image | Used for |
---|---|
All Characters/Classes' icons | |
All Transcendent Classes's icons | |
All Epic NPCs' icons (prepare to renew in the future) |
April Fools' Characters Icon
Streamlining
If the wiki editor were in HTML (or were simpler) and I had editing privileges I would actually try to do what I want to propose on my own, but its not, and I don't. I'd also like to know the general community consensus on how the new character template looks, just in case I'm in the minority.
I personally preferred the old format with this thing >
It was smaller and seemed more compact. On the other hand, I can see where someone would be coming from when wanting to have the base job class names shown too. All in all, I think it could work better with something like this:
Compact and informative. Thoughts?