Template talk:Characters: Difference between revisions
From Elwiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
Compact <i>and</i> informative. Thoughts? | Compact <i>and</i> informative. Thoughts? | ||
Ok if I actually made the whole thing would someone who can edit it be willing to at all or | Ok if I actually made the whole thing would someone who can edit it be willing to put it in at all or | ||
[[User:Hatoko|Hatoko]] ([[User talk:Hatoko|talk]]) 16:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC) | [[User:Hatoko|Hatoko]] ([[User talk:Hatoko|talk]]) 16:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:49, 1 February 2017
Position of classes
Frame of the icons
Image | Used for |
---|---|
All Characters/Classes' icons | |
All Transcendent Classes's icons | |
All Epic NPCs' icons (prepare to renew in the future) |
April Fools' Characters Icon
Streamlining
If the wiki editor were in HTML (or were simpler) and I had editing privileges I would actually try to do what I want to propose on my own, but its not, and I don't. I'd also like to know the general community consensus on how the new character template looks, just in case I'm in the minority.
I personally preferred the old format with this thing >
It was smaller and seemed more compact. On the other hand, I can see where someone would be coming from when wanting to have the base job class names shown too. All in all, I think it could work better with something like this:
Compact and informative. Thoughts?
Ok if I actually made the whole thing would someone who can edit it be willing to put it in at all or